®
Ethical Nonmonogamy: What Therapists Keep Getting Wrong (Quick Read)
Full post: Ethical Nonmonogamy: What Therapists Keep Getting Wrong
What ENM Is
Ethical nonmonogamy (ENM): Relationship structures in which all partners have knowledge of and consent to multiple romantic or sexual connections. Includes open relationships, swinging, polyamory, relationship anarchy, solo polyamory, and more.
Not the same as infidelity: ENM is built on consent and transparency, while cheating involves deception.
Prevalence: ~1 in 5 Americans has engaged in ENM at some point (Haupert et al., 2016).
Pathologizing Frameworks to Avoid
| What clinicians assume | What the evidence says |
|---|---|
| Avoidant attachment | No significant attachment style differences vs. monogamous people (Moors et al., 2014) |
| Commitment phobia | Commitment ≠ exclusivity; many ENM people are deeply committed to multiple partners |
| A phase or symptom | For many, nonmonogamy is a stable orientation rather than a transitional state |
| Jealousy = proof it's wrong | Jealousy is information rather than a verdict; ENM communities have sophisticated practices for working with it |
Key Vocabulary
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Metamour | A partner's partner (not your partner) |
| Nesting partner | A partner you live with |
| Compersion | Joy at a partner's happiness with another person |
| Kitchen table poly | All partners know and socialize with each other |
| Parallel poly | Partners' other relationships remain separate |
| Relationship anarchy | Rejects hierarchies between relationships |
| Solo polyamory | Multiple connections while prioritizing personal autonomy |
| Polycule | A network of romantically/sexually connected people |
What Affirming Practice Looks Like
- Don't assume the relationship structure is the presenting problem
- Ask about the specific structure, since ENM covers many structures
- Treat nonmonogamy as a possible orientation rather than a phase
- Examine your own mononormativity (the assumption that monogamy is the default/superior structure)
- Recognize that ENM relationships have real challenges worth exploring, without pathologizing the structure itself
ENM and Neurodivergent / LGBTQ+ Clients
- LGBTQ+ clients: Nonmonogamy may be part of rejecting heteronormative relationship scripts
- Autistic clients: Explicit negotiation in ENM may be more accessible than implicit monogamous norms
- ADHD clients: Variety and novelty of multiple connections may be regulating
These are reasons that make sense rather than pathological ones.
Mx. Love C. Dialogos, LMFT · They/Them · Buddhist Chaplain
Licensed in Wisconsin, Illinois, New York, Texas, Florida, Arizona, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, New Mexico, Hawaii, Idaho, and Alaska.
Explore Topics
Written by
Mx. Love C. Dialogos, LMFT
Mx. Love C. Dialogos, LMFT, is a licensed marriage and family therapist and Buddhist chaplain practicing by telehealth in 13 states. Their clinical writing has appeared in Psychotherapy Networker.
© 2026 Love Psychotherapy, LLC. All rights reserved. Love Psychotherapy® is a registered trademark.
