Skip to main content

Monster Making: What Your Mind Builds Out of Silence

Relationships & Sexuality

Monster Making: What Your Mind Builds Out of Silence

Why your mind invents worst-case stories out of silence in relationships, and three ways to catch it before it grows.

M
Mx. Love C. Dialogos, LMFT
•4 min read
Share
Abstract illustration representing the mind constructing a threatening story out of ambiguous silence
Listen to this post
Listen to this post

Monster Making: What Your Mind Builds Out of Silence

What happens when your mind fills an information gap with the worst possible story, and how to catch it.

Reyna texts her partner at 2pm. No response by 6. By 9, she's replayed three different versions of what the silence means, none of them generous.

Almost everyone in a relationship has experienced this without ever having a name for it: in the absence of information, your mind builds instead of sitting quietly and waiting.

An unanswered text. A change in tone. A neutral facial expression. A forgotten anniversary. Your mind constructs a story to explain these things, and the story it constructs is almost always worse than reality.

A partner's silence becomes contempt. A brief reply becomes withdrawal. A neutral face becomes disgust. A forgotten date becomes proof of how little you matter. None of this was said; all of it got invented and then reacted to as if it were fact.

I call this monster making.

Why your brain does this on purpose

This is a feature of how the nervous system handles uncertainty in relationships that matter to you, rather than a character flaw or a sign you're insecure or "too much." The older, faster parts of your brain evolved to treat ambiguous social cues as potential threats, and they'd rather you over-prepare for a betrayal that isn't coming than under-prepare for one that is. That's good evolutionary design and poor relational practice.

The cortex then does its part by building a narrative to explain the ambiguous cue, and it tends to select for the worst plausible interpretation, because that's the interpretation that keeps you safest if it turns out to be true.

Why avoiding the conversation makes the monster bigger

Most people, faced with a conversation that might be uncomfortable, avoid it. In the short term, this feels like self-protection. The discomfort gets deferred, maybe indefinitely.

That deferral works like a loan, with interest.

The conversation that didn't happen leaves the original ambiguity exactly where it was, which gives your mind more material to build with. New ambiguous moments get attached to the existing monster, and it grows. By the time the conversation finally happens, you're often addressing the monster instead of the small original issue: a partner who, over weeks or months, has quietly become a character in a story you've been telling yourself, with "evidence" accumulating in the total absence of anything that actually contradicts it.

Three things to do tonight

If you suspect monster making has been running in one of your relationships:

1. Notice the story you haven't checked. The unanswered text. The change in tone. Each one probably has a story attached to it by now, and that story is almost certainly partially or fully invented. Notice it before you act on it.

2. Ask instead of assume. Try: "I noticed you got quiet yesterday, and I wanted to check in. I've been telling myself a story about what that meant, and I'd rather hear it from you." This lands as far less threatening than the conversation your mind has already been having with itself.

3. Name the monster when you can see it. "I've been imagining you're pulling away because of something I did. Is that what's happening?" Naming it is a small act of vulnerability, and it interrupts the monster before it gets any bigger.

None of this is a permanent fix. The reflex to fill silence with the worst story will come back. The work is to catch it earlier each time and choose the conversation over the construction.

Quick Takeaways

  • In the absence of information, minds construct an explanation, and the explanation is almost never neutral.
  • This is a feature of threat-detection rather than a character flaw or a sign of insecurity.
  • Avoiding an uncomfortable conversation leaves the ambiguity in place and gives the monster more time to grow.
  • Naming the story you've been telling yourself, out loud, is often less threatening than the story itself.
  • Ask instead of assume: the real answer is almost always less catastrophic than the invented one.

Content on this site is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Nothing here creates a therapist–client relationship. If you are in crisis, call or text 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline) or go to your nearest emergency room.

Well wishes. 🙏

Mx. Love C. Dialogos, LMFT Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist | Buddhist Chaplain Pronouns: They/Them

© 2026 Love Psychotherapy, LLC. All rights reserved. Love Psychotherapy® and the Love Psychotherapy heart logo are registered trademarks of Love Psychotherapy, LLC.

Explore Topics

#communication#attachment#trust#relationships#emotional intelligence#anxiety
M

Written by

Mx. Love C. Dialogos, LMFT

Mx. Love C. Dialogos, LMFT, is a licensed marriage and family therapist and Buddhist chaplain practicing by telehealth in 13 states. Their clinical writing has appeared in Psychotherapy Networker.

© 2026 Love Psychotherapy, LLC. All rights reserved. Love Psychotherapy® is a registered trademark.


This article is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for clinical assessment or treatment. If you recognize your own experience here, bring it to a licensed clinician. If you are in treatment, talk with your provider before changing your treatment plan.

New article notifications

One email when a new article is published.